Commit 04a2d868 authored by Fabio Pelosin's avatar Fabio Pelosin

[Changelog] Add note about broken specs.

parent 51e22ffc
......@@ -3,6 +3,20 @@
[Core](https://github.com/CocoaPods/Core/master)
[Xcodeproj](https://github.com/CocoaPods/Xcodeproj/compare/0.5.0...master)
###### __Notice__
At some point in future the master repo will be switched to the YAML format of
specifications. This means that specifications with hooks (or any other kind of
dynamic logic) will not be accepted. Please let us know if there is need for
other DSL attributes or any other kind of support.
- Currently the following specifications fail to load as they depended on the
CocoaPods internals and need to be updated:
- LibComponentLogging-pods/0.0.1/LibComponentLogging-pods.podspec
- Lockbox/1.2.0/Lockbox.podspec
- RestKit/0.9.3/RestKit.podspec
- Three20/1.0.11/Three20.podspec
###### __Breaking__
- Support for inline podspecs has been removed.
......@@ -58,11 +72,11 @@
- Major clean up and refactor of the whole code base.
- Extracted the core classes into
[CocoaPods-Core](https://github.com/CocoaPods/Core) gem.
- Extracted command-line command & option handling into
[CLAide](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CLAide).
[cocoapods-core](https://github.com/CocoaPods/Core) gem.
- Extracted downloader into
[cocoapods-downloader](https://github.com/CocoaPods/cocoapods-downloader).
- Extracted command-line command & option handling into
[CLAide](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CLAide).
## 0.16.3
[CocoaPods](https://github.com/CocoaPods/CocoaPods/compare/0.16.2...0.16.3)[Xcodeproj](https://github.com/CocoaPods/Xcodeproj/compare/0.4.3...0.5.0)
......
......@@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ module Pod
else
results = validator.results
end
results.each do |result|
sorted_results = results.sort_by { |r| [r.type, r.message] }
sorted_results.each do |result|
name = validator.spec ? validator.spec.name : podspec.relative_path_from(dir)
version = validator.spec ? validator.spec.version : 'unknown'
messages_by_type[result.type] ||= {}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment