- 21 Apr, 2013 1 commit
- 
- 
Davis King authored
 
- 
- 14 Apr, 2013 8 commits
- 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authoredinclude some extra data to validate the state of the object. 
- 
Davis King authored
 
- 
- 13 Apr, 2013 8 commits
- 
- 
Davis King authoredthey are compatible. This was done in a way that is backwards compatible with previous versions of dlib. That is, we can still load data serialized by previous dlib versions. However, older versions of dlib can't load the new serialization format. 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authoredmatrices of float values. 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authoredout what the transformation matrix is. 
 
- 
- 10 Apr, 2013 2 commits
- 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authoredfor ranking functions which output constant values. 
 
- 
- 08 Apr, 2013 2 commits
- 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
 
- 
- 04 Mar, 2013 2 commits
- 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
 
- 
- 07 Apr, 2013 9 commits
- 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authoredpixel types without any information loss. 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authoredimages with unsigned char pixels. 
- 
Davis King authoredPreviously, we used an ASCII based format. It now uses a much more efficient binary format. The deserialization routines have been made backwards compatible with the previous format. So dlib can still deserialize older data but older software won't be able to read the new format. 
 
- 
- 04 Apr, 2013 4 commits
- 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authored
 
- 
- 03 Apr, 2013 4 commits
- 
- 
Davis King authoredrecent changes make its feature representation incompatible with previous versions. 
- 
Davis King authored
- 
Davis King authoredsince some detection templates may be larger than others and therefore naturally accumulate larger scores, therefore necessitating larger threshold values. 
- 
Davis King authoredvalidation routines set the detection threshold to negative infinity in an attempt to elicit all the possible detections for the purpose of computing mean average precision scores. This works fine when using the scan_image_boxes object but causes the detection quality to degrade when the scan_image_pyramid is used since this object performs random subsampling to avoid producing an excessive number of detections. The fix is to allow the user to set the adjust_threshold parameter themselves to whatever value they feel is reasonable rather than hard coding it to negative infinity. 
 
-